SPRING Social Prescribing Project: Evaluation Report July 2019 - October 2020
Documents
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. To request an accessible format contact us.
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. To request an accessible format contact us.
Introduction
This report evaluates the SPRING social prescribing project, which connects people to community‑based activities and support to improve their health and wellbeing.
The project focuses on individuals experiencing issues such as isolation, long‑term conditions or low mood.
The report is for:
funders
policymakers
health partners
organisations delivering social prescribing
Methodology
The evaluation used data recorded in the Elemental social prescribing system, along with wellbeing scores from the Short Warwick–Edinburgh scale. It also drew on monitoring information from delivery partners and feedback from staff.
The report builds on 2 earlier evaluations to summarise learning across several years.
Findings
The evaluation found that SPRING supported large numbers of people experiencing isolation, low wellbeing and long‑term health conditions.
Participants reported improvements in:
mental wellbeing
increased activity levels
better social connections
greater confidence
Social prescribers played a key role in helping people identify what matters to them and develop personalised pathways.
Delivery partners strengthened their capacity and created stronger community‑led health support. The project also helped health professionals meet patients’ needs by providing non‑clinical options for support.
Challenges included data quality, demand pressures and variation in local delivery.
Overall, the evidence shows SPRING made a positive difference to people’s wellbeing and strengthened community health infrastructure.
Considerations
These findings are based on data provided by delivery partners and may vary between areas.
The evaluation shows contribution rather than proving direct cause and effect.
Results should be seen as strong signs of positive impact, not definite proof.