Evaluation of Transforming Your Space: Final Report

Introduction

The programme aimed to:

• improve people’s quality of life

• improve local environments

• strengthen community assets

The evaluation focuses on environmental, social and community impacts. It’s intended for funders, policymakers and organisations running similar community or regeneration projects.

Methodology

The evaluation was carried out over several years using mainly qualitative research. It included:

36 case studies across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland

• interviews with people who benefited from the projects

• site visits

• policy analysis

Some projects were tracked over a longer period to understand whether benefits lasted. Because monitoring data was limited, most findings are based on feedback from:

• community groups

• project staff

• partners

Findings

The programme led to clear environmental improvements, such as:

• improved green and brownfield spaces

• increased biodiversity

• new or upgraded community facilities

There were also important community benefits. Many projects helped build confidence, skills and stronger local networks.

Relationships between residents and local authorities improved in several areas.

Some projects reduced antisocial behaviour and encouraged more positive use of public spaces. Others supported health and wellbeing through outdoor activities. However, much of this evidence is based on personal accounts rather than formal data.

Economic impacts were smaller but included some opportunities for employment, training and volunteering.

Long-term success often depended on key coordinators. Where funding for these roles ended, it was harder to maintain progress.

Overall, the programme achieved its aims and created lasting local benefits.

Considerations

When using these findings, consider that they’re based mainly on qualitative evidence collected during project delivery.

There was no consistent baseline data or comprehensive monitoring.

Impacts varied depending on:

• local circumstances

• the strength of partnerships

• funding arrangements

Sustainability was closely linked to ongoing staff support and maintenance funding.

The lessons from this evaluation should be seen as practice-based and specific to the contexts studied, rather than proof that the programme would produce the same results everywhere.