Skip to main content

Welcome to our new website. You may still see some pages from our old site as we move things over.

Better Off Evaluation: Final Report

Better Off Evaluation: Final Report (PDF, 0.7MB)

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. To request an accessible format contact us.

Introduction

This report evaluates the Better Off programme, which aimed to improve results for people recovering from drug use by combining rehabilitation with support to access:

  • education

  • skills training

  • employment

It explains what the programme achieved and what helped or hindered progress.

The report is for funders, policymakers and organisations working in recovery and employability.

Methodology

The evaluation draws on:

  • monitoring data

  • case studies

  • feedback from staff involved in the programme

  • feedback from participants involved in the programme

It reviews how services were delivered across different areas, what support participants received and how their progress was tracked.

Evidence was gathered throughout the life of the programme and summarised for this final report.

Findings

The evaluation found that combining drug rehabilitation with opportunities for training, education and work experience helped many participants progress in their recovery.

Holistic support, such as tailored guidance, mentoring and practical help, improved people’s confidence, stability and readiness to move into learning or employment.

Strong partnerships between treatment providers, employability services and local organisations were central to success. However, the report also highlights challenges, including:

  • variations in delivery

  • barriers linked to health

  • barriers linked to housing

  • difficulties accessing sustained employment

Overall, the programme demonstrated that integrated models could make a positive difference when recovery is closely linked to building skills and future opportunities.

Considerations

Findings reflect the evidence available at the time and vary across delivery areas.

The programme shows contribution rather than proving direct cause and effect.

Results depend on wider factors such as health, stability and labour‑market conditions.

The report offers useful learning for integrated recovery and employability programmes rather than a universal model.